(From an address before the General Assembly of the University of the Philippines, 1923.)
The educated Filipino
should, first, be distinguished by the power to do. The Oriental excels
in reflective thinking: he is a philosopher. The Occidental is a doer;
he manages things, men and affairs. The Filipino of today needs more of
this power to translate reflection into action. I believe we are coming
more and more to the conviction that no Filipino has the right to be
considered educated unless he is prepared and ready to take an active
and useful participation in the work, life, and progress of our country,
as well as in the progress of the world.
The power to do embraces the ability to produce enough to support oneself and to contribute to the economic development of the Philippines.
Undoubtedly, a man may be, and often is, an efficient producer of
economic goods and at the same time he may not be educated; but on the
other hand, should we consider a man who is utterly unable to support
himself and is an economic burden to the society in which he lives as
educated merely because he possesses the superficial graces of culture?
I
hope no one will understand me as saying that the only sign of economic
efficiency is the ability to produce material goods, for useful social
participation may take the form of any of the valuable services rendered
to society thru such institutions as the home, the school, the church,
and the government. The mother, for example, who takes good care of her
children, prepares wholesome meals, and trains them in morals and right
conduct at home, renders efficient service to the country as well the
statesman or the captain of industry. I would not make the power to do
the final and only test of the educated Filipino; but I believe that in
our present situation it is fundamental and basal.
The
educated Filipino, in the second place, should be distinguished not
only by his knowledge of the past and current events in the world's
progress, but more especially by his knowledge of his race, his people,
and his country, and his love of the truths and ideals that our
people have learned to cherish. Our character, our culture, and our
national history, are the core of our national life, and consequently,
of our education. I would not have the educated Filipino ignore the
culture and history of other lands, but can he afford to be ignorant of
the history and culture of his own country and yet call himself
educated?
The
educated Filipino, in the third place, must have ingrained in his
speech and conduct those elements that are everywhere recognized as
accompaniments of culture and morality, so that, possessing the capacity
for self-entertainment and study, he many not be at the mercy of the
pleasures of the senses or a burden to himself when alone.
There
are, then, at least, three characteristics which I believe to be the
evidence of the educated Filipino—the power to do, to support himself
and contribute to the wealth of our people; acquaintance with the
world's progress, especially with that of his race, people and
community, together with love of our best ideals and traditions; and
refined manners and moral conduct, as well as the power of growth.
http://www.filipiniana.net/publication/what-is-an-educated-filipino/12791881619453/1/0
thank you.
ReplyDeleteIs this the original?
ReplyDeletewhere was this published originally?
ReplyDelete